![]() ![]() Everything he wanted out of a deck had to be in Rounders. Daniel wanted this deck to be His signature, ideal deck. That's over 50 Combinations of Stocks and Finishes. Really? Are there even that many? I'm all for hyping up a deck but that statement just seems a little much to me. I tested over 50 different stocks and finishes to find and create my perfect deck of playing cards. I'm done now- I'm gonna go take some deep breaths. Either way, I'm pissed about it and I don't know why. So why would a reputable card flourisher such as Daniel Madison make a claim like that? Is he really testing all this crap stock? Wouldn't he of all people know right where to look to find a good stock? IMO, he's either lying through his teeth or is too dumb to know what good stock is. The people (like us) who really care simply don't bother. And it's all because of that silly claim! Seriously- think about it. And I have every single E deck- but I just don't know about this one. And I'm not usually like this with my playing card purchases! Hell, I can't stand D&D advertising but I have almost every one of their decks. Evan wrote:I went to the product page, saw the "tested over 50 different stocks and finishes," and then I X'd out.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |